INTRODUCTION
Bariatric surgery has recently become popular for treatment of morbidly obese patients, and post-bariatric body contouring surgery has also become more common. Post-bariatric body contouring surgery, from conventional abdominoplasty to lower- and upper-limb contouring, focuses on reducing redundant tissues and reshaping the body. Most body contouring procedures are performed due to a decreased volume of subcutaneous fat and increased skin laxity after massive weight loss. The abdominal area is the most common area for body contouring surgery in massive weight loss patients; therefore, our study focused on abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT).
Adipose tissue is an active endocrine and immune organ. In an obese state, adipocyte metabolism is impaired and cell homeostasis is broken [
1,
2]. For this reason, obesity is considered to be an independent risk factor for mortality and a causative factor of several major diseases, including coronary heart disease, hypertension, and various metabolic diseases [
3]. Current treatments for obesity range from dietary modifications to surgical treatment.
Subcutaneous fat tissue is divided into a superficial fat layer and a deep fat layer by the superficial fascial system, and these two layers have different histological and molecular characteristics [
4,
5]. Histologically, the deep fat layer is looser, and has more fibrous septa. On a molecular level, functional differences with subsequent differences in gene expression have been noted between the two layers. According to previous studies, deep fat is more metabolically active than superficial fat and is associated with metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [
6-
10].
Bariatric surgery results in durable and stable weight loss within 1 year following surgery. It is also called “DM surgery,” since it results in up to an 80% resolution of T2DM [
11]. There are two procedural types: restrictive and malabsorptive. The combination of these two types, as in gastric bypass or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), is the most popular bariatric surgical procedure. These procedures do not involve direct manipulation of the SAT, but instead induce a negative caloric balance that reduces SAT indirectly.
Although many studies have investigated SAT, most have been done at a single time point, instead of using a longitudinal design. Moreover, few studies have compared the changes that occur between the two layers of fat tissue upon losing weight. Because it is difficult to consistently follow-up with individual patients, no suitable modality for evaluation has been established. Therefore, we focused on (1) bariatric surgery, as a dramatically effective method of losing weight, and (2) fat-setting computed tomography (fat CT), as a quantitative measurement method to evaluate changes in superficial and deep fat. The aim of this study was to identify the changes in superficial fat and deep fat tissue measured by fat CT before and after bariatric surgery. The findings of this study will help achieve more desirable results from contouring surgery.
RESULTS
Eleven patients, with a mean age of 34.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 12.9 years) and a mean BMI of 41.8 kg/m
2 (SD, 7.7 kg/m
2) were followed up for a mean period of 5.5 months. Five patients underwent surgery using the sleeve procedure, five patients had a sleeve with bypass procedure, and one patient, with a BMI of 62.4 kg/m
2, underwent RYGB (
Table 1).
After bariatric surgery, the patient’s body weight and the areas of superficial and deep fat were significantly reduced compared to before surgery (
Table 2). The superficial fat layer tended to occupy a larger area than the deep fat layer both preoperatively and postoperatively, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in the reduction rate between the two areas (
Table 3). We then conducted a subgroup analysis to examine whether there were differences due to the degree of obesity, comparing patients with a BMI less than 40 kg/m
2 to those with a BMI over 40 kg/m
2 (class III obesity, also known as extreme obesity). The statistical analysis of the patients with a BMI less than 40 kg/m
2 showed no significant decreases in body weight, superficial fat, or deep fat after surgery. In the patients with a BMI less than 40 kg/m
2, the reduction rate of superficial fat was higher than that of deep fat, but the difference was not statistically significant (
Tables 4,
5). In patients with a BMI over 40 kg/m
2, there was a significant decrease in body weight, superficial fat, and deep fat after surgery. Unlike the patients with a BMI less than 40 kg/m
2, the reduction rate of the deep fat was higher than that of the superficial fat, but the difference was not statistically significant (
Tables 6,
7). We also investigated the reduction rate according to sex and found no significant differences (P=0.44 in males, P=0.56 in females).
DISCUSSION
Skin laxity, such as an “abdominal apron,” is a common problem after weight loss following by bariatric surgery. Many patients therefore need body contouring surgery, such as abdominoplasty [
12]. A comprehensive knowledge of the SAT is very helpful for successful body contouring surgery.
Studies have reported the following findings regarding SAT. First, bariatric surgery reduces the volume and weight of SAT [
13,
14]. Second, metabolic and cardiovascular diseases are more closely related to visceral fat than to SAT [
3]. Third, SAT is divided into two layers—deep subcutaneous adipose tissue (dSAT) and superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue (sSAT)—and each layer has different histological characteristics. Typically, in the abdomen, sSAT is thicker than dSAT and the proportion of dSAT increases with a higher BMI [
4,
15].
Most previous studies focused only on the extent of weight loss, the resolution of metabolic diseases, and complications after bariatric surgery. Physicians and general surgeons have studied the effects of bariatric surgery on hormone levels and gene expression, but histological changes of the two-layer SAT have not been investigated [
16,
17]. Detailed research on the characteristics of the two different fat layers is still in progress and not well defined, especially in relation to surgery. The available studies were limited to only postoperative results or thickness measurements at a single time point [
18-
20]. In this study, we analyzed sSAT and dSAT both before and after bariatric surgery. Predictably, we found marked decreases of 29.1% in superficial fat and 29.3% in deep fat following surgery. These reduction rates were not statistically significantly different. However, when patients were divided into two groups according to whether their BMI was less than or over 40 kg/m
2, we found different patterns in these subgroups. In patients with a BMI less than 40 kg/m
2, the reduction rate of sSAT tended to be higher than that of dSAT. By contrast, in patients with a BMI over 40 kg/m
2, the reduction rate of dSAT was higher than that of sSAT. Adipose tissue is an endocrine organ, and when promoted by a positive caloric balance, it induces adipocyte hypertrophy, a condition known as adiposopathy [
21]. In adiposopathy, adipocyte metabolism is decreased, consequently decreasing lipolysis and increasing insulin resistance [
1,
2]. These features of adiposopathy are more marked in dSAT than in sSAT. Deep fat is more metabolically active and is more closely associated with inflammatory gene expression and metabolic diseases, such as T2DM, than superficial fat [
6-
8]. Marinou et al. [
22] reported that deep fat depth was a strong predictor of global insulin resistance.
Bariatric surgery results in suppressed caloric intake, decreasing body weight and subcutaneous fat mass and causing changes in gut hormones. Tissue biopsy performed before and after surgery confirmed that the decreased fat mass was caused by a decreased volume of adipocytes, not by a reduced number of adipocytes [
2,
20,
23]. Because the number of adipocytes was not different, changes resulting from adipocyte hypertrophy are reversible and could be resolved through bariatric surgery. When adiposopathy is resolved through bariatric surgery, T2DM and metabolic syndrome are also resolved [
21,
24,
25]. Metabolic diseases such as T2DM are associated with dSAT, and it therefore seems that bariatric surgery is more closely associated with dSAT than with sSAT. It is expected that there will be a larger reduction of adipocyte volume in dSAT than in sSAT after bariatric surgery.
In the present study, we confirmed our hypothesis that the dSAT reduction rate was higher when bariatric surgery was performed in patients with a BMI over 40 kg/m2. Although the reduction rate of sSAT tended to be higher in patients with a BMI of less than 40 kg/m2, this have may been because patients with mild to moderate obesity have a higher proportion of sSAT. This might reflect homeostasis, in which our body maintains a proper fat ratio balance. Thus, in patients with a relatively low BMI, interventions may focus primarily on reducing sSAT. Conversely, in patients with a BMI over 40 kg/m2, a morbid state that is an indication for bariatric surgery, there is an urgent need to decrease the amount of dSAT. Therefore, it is reasonable that patients with higher BMIs have higher reduction rates of dSAT in weight loss.
The metabolically active dSAT can be modulated by bariatric surgery; therefore, plastic surgeons do not have to focus too closely on dSAT. Instead, surgeons should focus on correcting skin laxity, and paying careful attention to sSAT, which influences contour appearance, could help to achieve favorable results. We suggest that it might be better to perform abdominoplasty with sSAT-focused liposuction for patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, regardless of their BMI. In some cases, conversely, a larger amount of dSAT liposuction or dermolipectomy may be the key for achieving metabolic improvements.
The limitations of the present study include the following: the follow-up CT scans were not obtained at the same time in all patients, the measurements were made by only one expert, information on the patient’s lifestyle during the follow-up period was not recorded, and the abdominal SAT was represented by a single-cut image. However, CT data from postoperative follow-up provide valuable information that is difficult to obtain. The current study present results from 11 patients, but it is expected that more conclusive data will be obtained from additional cases in the future. Additionally, three bariatric surgical methods were used, although consistently applying a single procedure would have produced better results.
In this study, using fat CT to compare the two layers of adipose tissue, we observed differences in the reduction rate of sSAT and dSAT after weight loss following bariatric surgery, although the differences were not statistically significant. The reduction rates differed according to BMI. In patients with a BMI over 40 kg/m2, the reduction rate of dSAT was higher than that of sSAT. These results may be related to the metabolically active characteristics of deep fat and the body’s homeostatic processes that maintain an appropriate fat ratio. These findings may also serve as reference data for body contouring surgery.