Corrigendum to: Usefulness of the eyeball exposure area as an eye measurement modality through a comparison between eyes with inborn double eyelids and operated double eyelids

Article information

Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;28(4):166-166
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 October 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2021.00297-c1
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea

https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2021.00297

Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022;28(2):49-52

In the version of this article initially published, Figure 1 contains errors. On page 50, the correct version of the figure is below.

Fig. 1.

Schematic drawings of palpebral fissure height (PFH), exposed eyeball area (EEA), and the differences between the parameters. (A) Measured values in inborn double eyelids. (B) Measured values in operated double eyelids.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Schematic drawings of palpebral fissure height (PFH), exposed eyeball area (EEA), and the differences between the parameters. (A) Measured values in inborn double eyelids. (B) Measured values in operated double eyelids.