PublisherDOIYearVolumeIssuePageTitleAuthor(s)Link
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery10.14730/aaps.2017.23.1.36201723136-40Single-Layer vs. Double-Layer Donor Scalp Wound Closure in Strip Harvest.Muhammad Ahmadhttp://e-aaps.org/upload/pdf/aaps-23-36.pdf, http://e-aaps.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.14730/aaps.2017.23.1.36, http://e-aaps.org/upload/pdf/aaps-23-36.pdf
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology10.1002/uog.123762013422207-212Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort studyJ. Glavind, L. D. Madsen, N. Uldbjerg, M. Dueholmhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fuog.12376, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/uog.12376/fullpdf
Academic Emergency Medicine10.1197/j.aem.2004.02.2092004115561-562Single- vs. Double-layer Closure for Facial LacerationsA. J. Singerhttp://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1197%2Fj.aem.2004.02.209
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology10.1002/uog.188972017505667-667Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closureS. Demers, S. Robergehttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fuog.18897, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.18897
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.00620152126829Single- vs double-layer and locking vs nonlocking closure of uterus: missing woods for the trees?Shashikant L. Sholapurkarhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0002937815000071?httpAccept=text/plain, https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0002937815000071?httpAccept=text/xml
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics10.1016/s0020-7292(00)81562-3200070C43-C43Single layer -vs- two layer closure of uterus during caesarean section - an institutional experienceB. Mukhopadhyayhttp://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0020729200815623?httpAccept=text/plain, http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0020729200815623?httpAccept=text/xml, https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2981562-3, https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1016%2FS0020-7292(00)81562-3, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016/S0020-7292(00)81562-3
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology10.1002/uog.15248201546100-100OP16.03: Longitudinal Caesarean section scar evaluation in primiparous women after single or double layer uterotomy closure: prospective randomised studyJ. Hanacekhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fuog.15248, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.15248
BJU International10.1111/bju.151482020127164-70Single‐ vs multiple‐layer wound closure for flank incisions: results of a prospective, randomised, double‐blinded multicentre studyMaximilian C. Kriegmair, Nina Younsi, Kiriaki Hiller, Conrad Leitsmann, Karl F. Kowalewski, Fabian Siegel, Martin Rothamel, Manuel Ritter, Christian Bolenz, Martin Kriegmair, Lutz Trojan, Maurice S. Michelhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fbju.15148, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bju.15148, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/bju.15148, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bju.15148
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x20101176690-694Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesionsYJ Blumenfeld, AB Caughey, YY El-Sayed, K Daniels, DJ Lyellhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2010.02529.x, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x/fullpdf
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology10.1067/s0002-9378(03)01056-120031894925-929Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean deliveryCeleste Durnwald, Brian Mercerhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0002937803010561?httpAccept=text/xml, https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0002937803010561?httpAccept=text/plain